I was able to incorporate many contemporary art concepts into my art-making lesson plan by reinterpreting historical images of power. The pedagogy was made public through the publishing and tagging of a hybrid image. It provided an area to challenge established ideas regarding gender positionality.
I began to start working through my lesson plan shortly after I posted my blog two weeks ago (as evidenced by last week’s post). I wanted to focus on the art-making aspect of the lesson plan and pay particular attention to which tools I used. Most of my digital imaging knowledge comes from independent study studio courses—I was usually given a textbook for guidance and rarely had a teacher that could offer personal instruction.
What happened? What worked? What, if anything, didn’t work?
Jan Van Eyck's Arnolfini Portrait |
A quick visual scan of the work reveals a wealthy male in a position of power over a wealthy female. Her position closer to the bed (as well as potentially pregnant) contrasts his assertive pose and direct eye contact with the viewer. There are many interesting resources discussing the Arnolfini Portrait and potential symbolism, however I hesitate to delve into this area at the cost of further explaining my own experiences with this lesson plan. If you are interested in learning more, here are some interesting resources:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnolfini_Portrait#Interpretation_and_symbolism
- http://www.loschermo.it/articoli/view/25082
- http://www.themasterpiececards.com/famous-paintings-reviewed/bid/27677/Famous-Paintings-The-Arnolfini-Portrait
I began my piece by photographing my face in the same position as the male figure’s face. Using Photoshop tools such as color enhancers, masking, clone tools, healing spots, blurring, and burning/dodging I integrated my face into the image.
Hybrid image with my face added |
Hybrid image with both faces added |
I believed that posting this image on Facebook and Flickr (and tagging it so it will become a search result for the original image) would challenge public notions of patriarchy and gender stereotyping. However, privacy concerns and lack of feedback has stifled my ability to see its effects. I do find it extremely interesting that my boyfriend would not allow this image to be seen in public, as it could potentially be a target for anti-masculine attacks. When asked what in particular made him uncomfortable, he replied that he “didn’t want that picture to be the first impression someone would make of him.” After more prodding, he revealed further insight into his distress:
Because it makes me appear to be less masculine. It puts you, as the man, in the dominant role. The woman doesn't even get to look up, instead having to slyly look at the man hoping for his approval to look. And while yes, I am very happy with allowing these roles in our relationship and I’m fine with my current friends seeing something like this, I don't want to start new friendships with those assumptions.
His response to my questioning if it would be OK to post the hybrid image if my face was on the woman’s and his on the man’s:
I seem so arrogant. You’ve backed me into a wall and I see that I’m a hypocrite. Yes, it would be OK to post that image because I’m male and you’re female.
What challenges did you face? How did you handle challenges?
Beyond posting difficulties, I had a major software challenge. Photoshop began crashing on me every time I opened the image, and I couldn’t figure out what was wrong. Fortunately I was able to find a free online program ( http://pixlr.com/ ) that allowed me to finish the piece.
What changes (curriculum or pedagogy) are you interested in making if you were to teach it again? Why make these changes?
I would make a few changes to this plan if I could start from the beginning. First, I would make sure that my software worked well, and that other people I used felt comfortable publicly posting the resulting image online. I would also find a better studio space for taking the picture of the new faces to be added. It was extremely difficult to manipulate the shadows and color levels to match the original image.
Reflecting on the entire process, what stands out or is significant to you now?
The most significant learning experience of this project was realizing the sheer amount of time necessary to create a successful art lesson. It was extremely valuable to learn the ins-and-outs of course preparation and all of the variables that go into creating lessons that value contemporary art concepts and public pedagogy. On a personal level, I appreciated the dialogue this lesson facilitated with my boyfriend and its ability to challenge his views of gender positioning in imagery.
March,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed seeing your final results of your portrait. I have only used Photoshop a few times about 8 years ago. I am sure by now it is pretty complicated for a beginner. At what age level would you say a student could be successful using it for basic photo manipulation? Also, you mentioned that it took you a lot of time to do. About how many hours would you say you spent making your photo?
Nice having class with you. Best of Luck.
-Steve
The public pedagogy of challenging "established ideas regarding gender positionality" via publishing and tagging a hybrid image has great potential as contemporary art as public pedagogy in this art lesson. I was wondering about your comment in paying particular attention to the tools you used. Is this to guide what you would teach others to build capacity for digital imaging or other reasons? You list several tools to "enhance, mask, clone, burn, dodge." Consider the processes as having potential metaphorical meaning in teaching digital imaging. For example, what can the process of masking metaphorically mean as part of the meaning of the image?
ReplyDeleteA person essentially lend a hand to make significantly articles I might state.
ReplyDeleteThis is the first time I frequented your web page
and thus far? I surprised with the analysis you made to make this
actual put up amazing. Great activity!
Take a look at my weblog - proficiency